Mathematics

cosmos 16th May 2019 at 8:01pm
TableOfContents

Mathematics is the study of structures themselves. These are necessary in Science and in Art, as both require the invention of structures to either explain (and thus understand) the world, or for any other purpose (in the case of Art).

Mathematics, however, doesn't concern itself with the purposes or details of particular structures; rather, it commits itself with the abstract properties common among many structures.

Math is just what happens when one decides to think logically. It is the study of the logical consequences of arbitrary axioms.

It is both the Art and Science of the structure of structures. It studies many structures in the world, and creates an abstract structure to understand them. In this sense it is a Science. It also creates new unobserved abstract structures, often, generalizing observed ones. In this sense it is an Art.

Common structures

Maps of mathematics

map pichttps://minireference.com/static/tutorials/conceptmap.pdfanother map

Mathematics is sometimes called formal sciences.

lecture with nice comments about math being about classifying objects at begninning

Useful resources and tools

Twitter math list

http://www.dudamath.com/action.html

3blue1brown,

http://world.mathigon.org/

Geogebra web app

Demos graphing calculator

FormulaSheet

Online equation editor

EquationMap

WolframAlpha

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mathematics_portals

http://www.msri.org/web/msri/online-videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glearwgR1Ls

think twice

Books

How to solve it - Polya

Street-fighting mathematics

People

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/

Steven Strogatz

http://euler.nmt.edu/~jstarret/

Other links:

https://jeremykun.com/

http://mathgl.sourceforge.net/doc_en/Main.html

http://www.theshapeofmath.com/princeton/dynsys

https://www0.maths.ox.ac.uk/courses

From http://bactra.org/thesis/single-spaced-thesis.pdf :

Formalizing intuitions (Quine 1961) insist, the goal [of formalizing some notion] is that the formal notion match the intuitive one in all theeasy cases; resolve the hard ones in ways which don't make us boggle; and let us frame simple and fruitfulgeneralizations.

https://betterexplained.com/


http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/mmset.html#overview

http://planetmath.org/

http://map.mathweb.org/

http://www.cut-the-knot.org/

http://www.ams.org/open-math-notes?utm_content=buffer7c046&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Classification of mathematics: http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2010.html?t=53Axx&btn=Current

Journal of humanistic mathematics

Journal of mathematics and the arts

http://www.tricki.org/

https://www.risc.jku.at/research/theorema/software/

https://mir.fi.muni.cz/webmias-ntcir-12-100/ps

http://www.cs.kun.nl/~freek/

Solve common equations: https://www.fxsolver.com/

http://mathstud.io/

"in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them." ~ Von Neumann


Physically, math is just people playing with thoughts (neuronal activations), in the same way that we play with wooden blocks and other things. So math is playing with yourself.. Feynman was right.. "math is to physics what masturbation is to sex"


For each stop—each timbre, or type of sound, that the organ could make (viz. blockflöte, trumpet, piccolo)—there was a separate row of pipes, arranged in a line from long to short. Long pipes made low notes, short high. The tops of the pipes defined a graph: not a straight line but an upward-tending curve. The organist/math teacher sat down with a few loose pipes, a pencil, and paper, and helped Lawrence figure out why. When Lawrence understood, it was as if the math teacher had suddenly played the good part of Bach’s Fantasia and Fugue in G Minor on a pipe organ the size of the Spiral Nebula in Andromeda—the part where Uncle Johann dissects the architecture of the Universe in one merciless descending ever-mutating chord, as if his foot is thrusting through skidding layers of garbage until it finally strikes bedrock. In particular, the final steps of the organist’s explanation were like a falcon’s dive through layer after layer of pretense and illusion, thrilling or sickening or confusing depending on what you were. The heavens were riven open. Lawrence glimpsed choirs of angels ranking off into geometrical infinity. (cryptonomicon)

The basic problem for Lawrence was that he was lazy. He had figured out that everything was much simpler if, like Superman with his X-ray vision, you just stared through the cosmetic distractions and saw the underlying mathematical skeleton. Once you found the math in a thing, you knew everything about it, and you could manipulate it to your heart’s content with nothing more than a pencil and a napkin. He saw it in the curve of the silver bars on his glockenspiel, saw it in the catenary arch of a bridge and in the capacitor-studded drum of Atanasoff and Berry’s computing machine. (cryptonomicon)